<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wisconsin Business and Commercial Litigation &#187; Fee Agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noahfiedler.com/category/fee-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noahfiedler.com</link>
	<description>Badger State Litigation Information for In-House and Private Practice Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blended Fee Agreements Sometimes Work</title>
		<link>http://noahfiedler.com/2009/05/blended-fee-agreement-used-in-high-dollar-school-investment-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://noahfiedler.com/2009/05/blended-fee-agreement-used-in-high-dollar-school-investment-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fee Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noahfiedler.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blended fee agreements are becoming more common in high-dollar specialized litigation, and can benefit both the client and the law firm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">On May 19, 2009, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ran an <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/45368662.html" target="_blank">article</a> discussing the $765,000 cost of a lawsuit brought by five local school districts seeking the return of $200 million in investments made in 2006.</span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">The Houston law firm involved is charging $325 per hour.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Milwaukee firms involved in highly specialized litigation generally charge, on purely hourly basis, this much or more. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>What’s interesting here is that the school districts’ payment arrangement also includes a contingent-fee component, providing for additional legal fees ranging from 5% of any recovery below $50 million and up to 15% of the total recovery if the case gets to trial.</span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin: 0in 0in 12pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">These kinds of blended-fee arrangements are becoming more common, particularly in high-dollar cases.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Agreements like this can be useful, guaranteeing the law firm some sort of payment for its work, but also saving the client from paying the full price of hiring specialized litigation counsel unless there’s some measure of success.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://noahfiedler.com/2009/05/blended-fee-agreement-used-in-high-dollar-school-investment-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

